Commognitive Review: Challenges for Lecturers for Overcome The AI Invasion in Contextual Problem-Solving
Kata Kunci:
AI, commognitive, contextual problemsAbstrak
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has often been found in solving contextual problems in the world of education, both secondary and university. Solving contextual mathematics problems at university requires a good and accurate understanding of concepts. This qualitative descriptive research was conducted on 20 private university students in Indonesia. A total of one contextual mathematics problem is given to be worked on for 20 minutes. One of the most appropriate student work results is selected from all students. The results of this work are then analyzed together with the results of AI work cognitively. The results of the analysis show that in the words use component, students and AI are able to use words or mathematical symbols correctly. However, in the visual mediators component, the AI experienced an error in illustrating an image that was contrary to the conditions it should be in. AI also conveys arguments that contradict the given conditions (narratives). The steps taken by AI in solving questions are also different from students who use conventional methods (routines). The research results show that students' conventional way of solving contextual mathematics problems is better than AI, in other words the invasion of AI into the world of education can still be overcome using conventional methods, especially when solving contextual problems.
Referensi
X. Zhai et al., “A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020,” Complexity, vol. 2021, 2021.
S. Rifky, “Dampak Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence Bagi Pendidikan Tinggi,” Indones. J.Multidiscip. Soc. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2024.
I. Saputra, M. Astuti, M. Sayuti, and D. Kusumastuti, “Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats and Obstacles. A Literature Review.,” Indones. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1590–1600, 2023.
A. Yang, “Challenges and Opportunities for Foreign Language Teachers in the Era of Artificial Intelligence,” Int. J. Educ. Humanit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2024.
J. A. Muarif, F. A. Jihad, M. I. Alfadli, and D. I. Setiabudi, “Hubungan Perkembangan Teknologi Ai Terhadap Pembelajaran Mahasiswa,” J. Pendidik. IPS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–60, 2023.
…, E. Dhaniswara, O. Arifudin, and B. A. Rukiyanto, “Analisis Dampak Kolaborasi Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligences (AI) Dan Kecerdasan Manusia Terhadap Dunia Pendidikan Di Indonesia,” Innov. J. …, vol. 4, pp. 9312–9319, 2024.
Y. Wardat, M. A. Tashtoush, R. AlAli, and S. Saleh, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives, Practices and Challenges,” Iraqi J. Comput. Sci. Math., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 60–77, 2024.
W. A. Fitri and M. H. H. Dilia, “Optimalisasi Teknologi AI dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran,” Cendekia Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 50–54, 2024.
Suariqi Diantama, “Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelegent (AI) Dalam Dunia Pendidikan,” DEWANTECH J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2023.
H. Zeinz, “Digitalization and A.I. as Challenges and Chances for Future Teaching and Teacher Education: A Reflection,” Beijing Int. Rev. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2–3, pp. 427–442, 2019.
K. Marlin et al., “Manfaat dan Tantangan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligences (AI) Chat GPTTerhadap Proses Pendidikan Etika dan KompetensiMahasiswa Di Perguruan Tinggi,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 5192–5201, 2023.
N. Abdullah, L. Halim, and E. Zakaria, “VStops: A thinking strategy and visual representation approach in mathematical word problem solving toward enhancing STEM literacy,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 2014.
A. K. Jitendra et al., “Teaching Mathematical Word Problem Solving: The Quality of Evidence for Strategy Instruction Priming the Problem Structure,” J. Learn. Disabil., 2015.
L. S. Fuchs et al., “The role of cognitive processes, foundational math skill, and calculation accuracy and fluency in word-problem solving versus prealgebraic knowledge,” Dev. Psychol., 2016.
E. Novak and J. L. Tassell, “Studying preservice teacher math anxiety and mathematics performance in geometry, word, and non-word problem solving,” Learn. Individ. Differ., 2017.
K. Hoogland, J. de Koning, A. Bakker, B. E. U. Pepin, and K. Gravemeijer, “Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance,” Stud. Educ. Eval., 2018.
E. Putut, L. Emanuel, and F. Anam, “Sebuah Tinjauan Commognitive : Apakah Matriks Singular ?,” BRILIANT J. Ris. dan Konseptual, vol. 7, no. 54, pp. 922–930, 2022.
E. P. L. Emanuel and Meilantifa, “Dimanakah Nilai Ekstrim Fungsi Kuadrat Ditinjau dari Lensa Commognitive ?,” BRILIANT J. Ris. dan Konseptual, vol. 7, no. 54, pp. 269–279, 2022.
E. Putut, L. Emanuel, T. Nusantara, A. Rahman, and R. Rahardi, “Why am I confused ? Commognitive Conflict in Non-ordinary Question About Number Division,” J. Reatt. Ther. Dev. Divers., vol. 6, no. 5s, pp. 891–901, 2023.
E. Putut, L. Emanuel, T. Nusantara, and R. Rahardi, “Does Domain of Absolute Value Function Always Positive ? Commognitive-Conflict Analysis of Students of First Semester,” Qalamuna J. Pendidikan, Agama, dan Sos., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 795–806, 2024.
N. Presmeg, “Commognition as a lens for research,” Educ. Stud. Math., 2016.
R. Toscano, J. M. Gavilán-Izquierdo, and V. Sánchez, “A study of pre-service primary teachers’ discourse when solving didactic-mathematical tasks,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 11, 2019.
V. Mudaly and S. Mpofu, “Learners’ views on asymptotes of a hyperbola and exponential
function: A commognitive approach,” Probl. Educ. 21st Century, 2019.
A. Thoma and E. Nardi, “Transition from School to University Mathematics: Manifestations of Unresolved Commognitive Conflict in First Year Students’ Examination
Scripts,” Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Educ., 2018.
D.-J. Kim et al., “Discourses of Functions – University Mathematics Teaching Through a Commognitive Lens,” Educ. Stud. Math., 2019.
T. Nachlieli and E. Heyd-Metzuyanim, “Commognitive conflicts as a learning mechanism towards explorative pedagogical discourse,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., 2021.
E. P. L. Emanuel, Y. G. Meidiana, and Suhartono, “Studi Komparasi Penggunaan Google Meet Dan Whatsapp Group Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Hangtuah 4 Surabaya,” Briliant J. Ris. dan Konseptual, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 849–853, 2021.
A. Jamal, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teacher Education: Opportunities &
Challenges,” Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 139–146, 2023.29. S. J. H. Yang, “Guest Editorial: Precision Education - A New Challenge for AI in Education,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 105–108, 2021.
E. Pratiwi, T. Nusantara, S. Susiswo, and M. Muksar, “Textual and contextual commognitive conflict students in solving an improper fraction,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., 2020.
J. Lu, Y. Tao, J. Xu, and M. Stephens, “Commognitive responsibility shift and its visualizing in computer-supported one-to-one tutoring,” Interact. Learn. Environ., 2020.
